I agree with Thomas' strategy.
Dave
Thomas Beale writes:
>
>
> amarcelo wrote:
>
> > This is not a technical issue but more of a human frailty issue (which
> > could affect promotions of an open source EMR):
> >
> > If you're an MD, which of these two products would you choose to
> > use(assuming it's not imposed on you by the hospital or HMO):
> >
> > Product A: open source, all transactions logged, not editable by anyone
> > -even you -, perfect for electronic medico-legal documentation
> >
> > Product B: open source, all transactions logged, _editable only by you the
> > MD_, (ergo, imperfect for electronic medico-legal documentation- but
> > good enough for paper documentation)...
>
> Product C: open source, all transactions logged, additions can be made by
> those to whom consent has been given; each change is indelible, and maintained
> separately from previous ones; tamperproof. (ergo ok for medico-legal....)
>
> - thomas beale
>
>
>
