At 09:15 PM 5/9/00 +1000, you wrote:
> > It's easy Dave, all that is needed is for one to have spent his/her 
> years during
> > the RPC -> ORB revolution (with deaths such as ATLAS on the way) doing 
> software
> > engineering! Ooops.....
> >
> > The Edwards/Orfali books aren't bad, despite the silly Martians all 
> over the
> > place, but their technical content is quite good.
>
>I don't want to be rude, and I love to hold a book in my hands, but I 
>believe that if you don't / can't publish a "standard" (or whatever) in a 
>clearly understandable & complete form _online_ , you are lost.
>
>Nowadays, in these very fast developing times, I don't buy books any more 
>to get known with a topic. I "learn" the basics on the net, and if I 
>consider it worth knowing, I might shop for a book on this topic just for 
>the pure joy of reading it in the bathtub (definitely beats taking the 
>monitor to the spa). I know that most fellow developers do the same. There 
>are exceptions, but they are very rare.

There are a lot of places on the web with good CORBA (distributed object 
discussions).  Go to http://www.cetus-links.org
and click on CORBA (or go directly to 
http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_corba.html) .  There are a large number of 
links there with tutorials, etc. (Including a link to our web pages at Los 
Alamos!).


>Ivory tower programmers who still believe in papers and books as _primary_ 
>(or even unique) distribution channel of knowledge have lost contact to 
>reality.

As most people know I use electronic documents primarily, but I find that 
hard books and papers are still useful and complementary to what is 
on-line.  Each has there place and advantages.

Dave


>Horst

Reply via email to