On 8 Sep 2003, Tim Cook wrote:
> Mr. Reynolds' objections to PDF are reasonable but I note he totally
> evaded the mention of Postscript and Rich Text (RTF) both
> non-proprietary and both maintain the capabilities desired by the
> Editorial Committee.
I understand the need of post editing things authors sended. But what about
plain HTML. It can be read by Word for post processing and authors are able
to use any editor of choice. Some people will even have problems to export
RTF sanely.
Just my two Euro-Cents
Andreas.
