I've tested Freenx from a dialup over our Cisco VPN connection and was very impressed compared to Citrix Metaframe as well as the various VNC's. The screen "caching" On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 14:15 +1000, David Guest wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tim Churches wrote: > > | How well does it seem to perform, compared to VNC or TightVNC? > | Better performnce over slower connections seems to be FreNX's main > | drawcard. > > > I don't have any slow connections, Tim. ;-) > > However, on ADSL it is clearly faster for linux to linux > (freenx_server) connections than VNC. > > It's a little harder to tell for linux to freenx to a MS terminal > server clone for rdp. Unfortunately, the automated connection does not > work for my WinConnect server (MS TS clone). I am not sure if it the > connection works seamlessly for a standard TS. > > The possibility of having a Windows application appearing > automagically on my Linux desktop remains, at least for the moment, an > intriguing possibility. > > David > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFBcfHYrI5sriRgbZwRAiuDAKCd33Q/2sY+PB5SePQ/TvKK1TBTJQCfRFdM > ojzum6DIcKbsKrqv+7yXGnI= > =Klac > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Dean Hopstein Senior Interface Analyst Intranet Coordinator/Developer Hattiesburg Clinic 415 South 28th Avenue Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Tel: (601) 579-5279 Pager: (601) 459-0428 Pager Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and protected by law. The information is intended only for the person or organization addressed in this e-mail. If you share or copy the information you may be breaking the law. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender of the e-mail by the telephone number listed on this e-mail. Please destroy the original; do not e-mail back the information or keep the original.
