Lars -

FYI: We will be starting the release process for the OpenHPI 2.15.0 development 
release in about 2 weeks.   But in order to start the release process, we first 
need:
1.  All development completed.
2.  All new features/enhancements that are planned for the 2.15.0 release 
merged on top-of-trunk, and unit-tested.

Once, 1 & 2 above are done - we can move on to the release process.

A description of what goes on during the 2 week OpenHPI release process is 
found here:
www.openhpi.org/OpenHPI/ReleaseSteps

Please let us know when your work is completed on your new simulator - and you 
are ready to merge on top-of-trunk.  I think the new simulator is the last bit 
that needs to go into the top-of-trunk.

Also, if someone else has other OpenHPI work that is still pending for 2.15.0, 
please let me know.

Thanks for listening.

--michael

Regards,
Michael Bishop
Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco)
Hewlett-Packard Company
3404 E. Harmony Rd.  Bldg. 5L, Post B7,  Mailstop 42
Fort Collins, CO  80528-9599
Phone: 970-898-4393
E-Mail: [email protected]







> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Wetzel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 1:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco); Devarajulu, Mohanasundaram
> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] New simulator testing
>
>
> Hi Mohan and Michael,
>
> I will investigate it. But due to some other tasks, I will
> need some time.
> Hope to get an answer until next week.
>
> And thanks for testing!!
>
> Lars
>
> On Wednesday, 26. May 2010 17:54, Bishop, Michael (ISB
> Linux/Telco) wrote:
> > Lars -
> >
> > I agree with Mohan that debug messages should not be turned
> on by default.
> >
> > I'm not sure the old simulator should be removed from openhpi.conf.
> > Perhaps it could be commented out - and the new simulator
> used as the
> > default plug-in.  Does anyone else have an opinion about
> this? If the new
> > simulator is going to be the default plug-in - it needs to
> be rock solid.
> >
> > Please investigate Mohan's comment about the log file (#3
> below).  We do
> > not want the new simulator to be confusing to OpenHPI
> users, especially if
> > it becomes the default plug-in.
> >
> > Also - please investigate 4 and 5 and let us know of any
> changes you decide
> > to make.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --michael
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael Bishop
> > Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco)
> > Hewlett-Packard Company
> > 3404 E. Harmony Rd.  Bldg. 5L, Post B7,  Mailstop 42
> > Fort Collins, CO  80528-9599
> > Phone: 970-898-4393
> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mo...@fc [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:06 PM
> > > To: Lars Wetzel
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Openhpi-devel] New simulator testing
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Lars,
> > >
> > > New simulator is having better results as for as hpib-test is
> > > concerned.
> > > Here are some of my observations with the testing.
> > >
> > > 1. Looks like the debug option is turned on by default in the new
> > > simulator plugin. This could be off.
> > >
> > > 2. Once the new_simulator code is merged the old
> simulator information
> > > could be removed from the openhpi.conf
> > >
> > > 3. I do not understand the need for the log file in the
> openhpi.conf.
> > > More over even if I define two logfiles for 2 new_simulator
> > > entries, it
> > > takes only one.
> > >
> > > 4. The default simulation.data needs to have complete
> entity path for
> > > every entity. But there are few that do not have the base
> > > path now. They
> > > are mis-interpreted now, based on the path defined in the
> > > openhpi.conf.
> > > They are {SYSTEM_BOARD,1}, {DISK_DRIVE,2} in the
> > > ANNUNCIATOR/RDR_DETAIL.
> > > They get converted to {SYSTEM_BOARD,X}, {DISK_DRIVE,X} (X
> is 9 in my
> > > test case) as {SYSTEM_CHASSIS,1} is prefixed to these.
> These could be
> > > seen in the output of hpigensimdata
> > >
> > > 5. timestamps are changed in the hpigensimdata output too.
> > >
> > > I will be doing more testing. Will report the results to
> you as I find
> > > out more.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Mohan
> > >
> > > --
> > > mo...@fc <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> >---
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>
> --
> -------------------------------
> Dipl. Wi.ing.
> Lars Wetzel
> Uttinger Str. 13
> 86938 Schondorf a. Ammersee
>
> Tel.: 0179-2096845
> Mail: [email protected]
>
> USt-IdNr.: DE181396006
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to