> -----Original Message----- > From: Frank C. Earl [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 23:03 > To: Lars Wetzel > Cc: Earl, Frank; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] Log dump for issue #1868725 put > topastebin.com... > > Lars Wetzel wrote: > > > I will look a little bit deeper in both files in the next days. > > > > Thanks! > > > Don't wonder about the questions, I don't have any hardware here and I > want to > > exclude any firmware issue as far as it is possible. > > > > I'm familiar with the concept, trust me. :-D > > > Btw. you mentioned you use a SHMM-500. I think it will work with > synchronous > > SEL? > > > > Okay, I'll look into that one. Do you know if the Colorado Springs > CMM's will work in that mode as well? > > > Did you have two daemons running which are connected to the same > ShelfManager? > > > > To the best of my current knowledge only one daemon is up. In an HA > configuration, the monitoring and management boards would have a daemon > up on both the master and > the standby, but that'd just increase IPMI traffic, wouldn't it? We > don't care overmuch about gaps in information as long as it stays up and > self-heals over a realistic timeframe. >
It's a bad idea to have 2 daemons talking to the Shelf Manager at the same time. They will compete for SDR and SEL access and it won't work properly. In a HA configuration, only the master daemon should talk to the Shelf Manager (Been there, done that a couple of years ago). Pierre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Openhpi-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
