On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:43:07AM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 10:38 -0700, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > > we're back into the "we did a spec, so the code can't change" loop. > > burn the spec in your fireplace or wood stove > > Fair enough, the spec isn't a gold standard. But, let's not burn the > baby as well. Why don't we clean up the code and see where it gets us? > Incremental changes to a working implementation seem far more palatable > than slash-and-burn.
Maybe you should lay down the requirement first. - why do we need an intermediate API - what differences does it - what devices does it abstract - what are the users _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
