Sean> Is the idea that the user calls connect() and then receives
Sean> a single callback indicating that the connection has been
Sean> established? If so, then the user may need to modify the QP
Sean> to the INIT state, which would require some knowledge
Sean> already of the path. We would also need to be clear on
Sean> whether the QP is expected to be in the INIT state before
Sean> connect is called, or if it could be in any arbitrary state.
Sean> The other alternative is to provide multiple callbacks
Sean> during connection establishment.
To me it makes sense for the generic CM API to be defined so that an
IB QP must be in the INIT state before being passed to connect().
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
