Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:04, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
[same patch just generated with diff -up]
OpenSM: OpenIB vendor layer: Implement osm_vendor_delete
[I've done some testing of this; are there any regressions for this ?]
OpenSM call osm_vendor_delete during osm_opensm_destroy.
It is invoked during exit.
Actually, it should have said "Implement osm_vendor_unbind" rather than
delete.
Well the semantics are very old. We stick to the old osm_vendor_api.h. Maybe we
should not have.
But now we have too much depending on this API that I urge you not to modify it
if possible.
OpenSM calls it in a similar place (as it stops the SA and SM MAD
controllers). I went through this starting and stopping the OpenSM a
number of times although did not do this "infinitely".
I was asking about any other explicit regressions.
No we do not have tests for the osm_vendor_api.h. It might have been a good
idea.
We do have now some stuff for the Windows code. Maybe we should try and make a
test suite
from it. Liran - what do you think ?
-- Hal
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
