On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 15:52, Sean Hefty wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 15:29, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > >>>Is this ib_ptr or ipoib_ptr ? I would think iWARP devices would need > >>>this. > >> > >>I think that we can implement the CMA interface without adding this pointer > >>by > >>using ARP and the private data in the CM REQ. > > > > True if that is the approach taken. > > I thought that there was agreement to use the private data in the CM REQ. > Using > ARP is just taking advantage of existing functionality.
Is there any harm in exposing this ? > >> Is it needed for any other purpose? > > > > SDP does this too (as well as AT). > > What does SDP use this for? Same thing as AT right now. > Can it get to the same data another way? Probably. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
