Sean Hefty wrote: >> BTW,do you think we need this for 2.6.18? >> It does fix a bug when RTU is lost ... > > The chances of an RTU being repeatedly lost, but user data being received over > the same path seems fairly low IMO. My take is that it's probably not needed > for 2.6.18, but that depends on where we are in the 2.6.18 release cycle.
I think we need first to commit this to the SVN and have different developers (eg people working on iSER/NFSoRDMA/SRP/Lustre passive side and ofcourse SDP) test and experience with it before pushing it upstream, targeting 2.6.19 makes sense to me. Not fully handling this race is not a bug but rather a feature that was missing in the openib stack from day one for which now we have a patch that attempts to address it. Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
