That seems good.
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 09:29 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > Tom Tucker wrote: > > The only "correct" way would be to declare a sockaddr structure * to a > > struct socket_storage allocated buffer and waste 4 bytes in the rdma_cm_id > > structure. > > > > Anyway, it's buggin' me...Maybe I'm being anal... > > > > Thoughts? > > We could change the definition to something similar in the kernel: > > struct sockaddr src_addr; > u8 src_pad[sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage) - > sizeof(struct sockaddr)]; > > I'm guessing this sort of change wouldn't require any changes to any of the > clients. > > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
