On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:22:10PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The PCI config APIs have traditionally enforced very strong ordering.
> Heck, the PCI config APIs often take a spinlock on each read or write;
> so they are definitely not intended to be as fast as MMIO.

s/often/always/.  It's implemented in drivers/pci/access.c.

I think the right way to fix this is to ensure mmio write ordering in
the pci_write_config_*() implementations.  Like this.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index ea16805..c80f1ba 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
 
 #include "pci.h"
 
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ int pci_bus_write_config_##size \
        if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;       \
        spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);                            \
        res = bus->ops->write(bus, devfn, pos, len, value);             \
+       mmiowb();                                                       \
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);                       \
        return res;                                                     \
 }
@@ -102,6 +103,7 @@ int pci_user_write_config_##size                            
        \
        if (likely(!dev->block_ucfg_access))                            \
                ret = dev->bus->ops->write(dev->bus, dev->devfn,        \
                                        pos, sizeof(type), val);        \
+       mmiowb();                                                       \
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);                       \
        return ret;                                                     \
 }

_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to