Just adding yet another link to every page. The homepage already has thirty four different things you can click on.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46 PM, DeWitt Clinton <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something. What is there to disagree with? > > Serious question, I can't even guess at the objection. > > -DeWitt > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:43 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, but people give Google data, often personal data, with every >> interaction. That's very different than the OpenID site. >> >> I don't care enough to argue, so go for it if you feel strongly. >> >> --David >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:40 PM, DeWitt Clinton <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Did you know that "privacy" is the one link that appears on every page >>> hosted by google? >>> >>> (Okay, not really, but it's pretty darn close.) >>> >>> There's a good reason for this, and it sets a very good example. So +1 >>> to putting the link in the footer on openid.net. And on every site. >>> >>> -DeWitt >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:32 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Please no. There are very few parts of the site which people are >>>> actually interacting with and where we accept data. I'm fine with this on >>>> pages for things like the membership tool and wiki. >>>> >>>> --David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> They look good. >>>>> >>>>> In addition, I feel that it is a good practice to put privacy policy >>>>> link as a footer item in every page as well. >>>>> In our case, right next to "Contact Us" in the footer. >>>>> >>>>> =nat >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (2010/01/28 10:00), John Ehrig wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Darin at Refresh mocked up a couple of options for the higher >>>>> visibility location for the privacy policy (attached). Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [ >>>>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] >>>>> *On Behalf Of *John Ehrig >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:51 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] OIDF Privacy Policy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Actually, we already do have an approved and actively in use OIDF >>>>> privacy policy (see the attached). A couple of issues: >>>>> >>>>> 1) It is buried in the membership portal and only viewable when you >>>>> first sign up as a new member (which is why it took me so long to track it >>>>> down) >>>>> >>>>> 2) It seems to be written specifically as a member privacy policy >>>>> (which may not really be an issue if we are ok with it as is for that >>>>> purpose) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can immediately fix issue #1 by posting it in an easy to find/view >>>>> page. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Longer term, we can use this existing policy as a stating point if we >>>>> want to improve or broaden it within the legal or privacy committee. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [ >>>>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] >>>>> *On Behalf Of *John Bradley >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:00 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] OIDF Privacy Policy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think that it would be fine to post redacted versions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I suspect that a page with the companies and individuals who have >>>>> signed up for WG is probably more useful than the scanned agreements >>>>> themselves. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I made a IPR declaration three years ago when the OIDF was formed and >>>>> the PAPE WG started. I don't recall anyone telling me it was going to be >>>>> scanned and posted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I like most people haven't thought about it in a while because there >>>>> haven't been new WG. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If we are going to publish information that people give us we need to >>>>> make that clear at the time of collection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We may be violating privacy laws outside the US. I would prefer to >>>>> make sure it is not an issue for the membership. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John B. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2010-01-27, at 2:47 PM, Mike Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It would be fine to post digital images with the signatures and address >>>>> information redacted – possibly by overlaying them with “Information on >>>>> file >>>>> with OIDF” or something of that sort. (Sort of how elevators often >>>>> contain >>>>> messages about the elevator license being on file at such-and-such place.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [ >>>>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> >>>>> ] *On Behalf Of *David Recordon >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:40 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] OIDF Privacy Policy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey John, >>>>> >>>>> I'm happy to have us reconsider the policy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The idea is to make it incredibly transparent around who has signed >>>>> what (when it comes to IP). So far you're the first person in three years >>>>> to say anything about it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Considering that there can be different versions of documents and some >>>>> documents with options, scanning them as PDFs seemed like the easiest and >>>>> most accurate method. 99% of the time it's also companies signing the >>>>> agreements and using corporate addresses versus personal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If Global Inventures is able to manage these agreements and keep up to >>>>> date online records, I'm less worried about each agreement >>>>> being available online. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That said, they should be made available upon request. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --David >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:07 AM, John Bradley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In the process of setting up the AX 1.1 WG a number of things have come >>>>> to light. >>>>> >>>>> One is some confusion around who needs to submit what sort of >>>>> agreement, Personal or Company. >>>>> Perhaps our new Secretary can have a look at that. >>>>> >>>>> The more important one is that the OIDF has a practice of positing >>>>> scanned documents publicly including peoples signature. >>>>> >>>>> A number of us don't think publicly posting our address info with a >>>>> scan of our signature is such a good idea. >>>>> >>>>> I think everyone agrees that who has signed contribution agreements and >>>>> what WG they apply to should be public. >>>>> >>>>> However there are ways to do that are less subject to identity theft >>>>> and other issues. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to recommend that one of our committees (perhaps the legal >>>>> one) or a sub committee. >>>>> >>>>> Review and publish the OIDF privacy policy and specifically if >>>>> practices like posting members PII publicly are appropriate. >>>>> >>>>> The board can then consider those recommendations. >>>>> >>>>> In the interim I would like GlobalInventures to redact my signature >>>>> from any and all of the IPR agreements they publish. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we can be credible respecting peoples right to privacy on >>>>> the internet if we don't do a credible job with our own members. >>>>> >>>>> There may be other privacy issues I am not currently aware of as well. >>>>> >>>>> I think being proactive about privacy can only increase participation >>>>> from the community in general. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> John B. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> board mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> board mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> board mailing >>>>> [email protected]http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Nat Sakimura ([email protected]) >>>>> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. >>>>> Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 Fax:+81-3-6274-1547 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> board mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> board mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> board mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board > >
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
