Mike - your statement that "The effort to reach consensus was NEGLIGIBLE to
zero" is incorrect. Indeed, the editors acknowledged your and Filip's comments
in their reply
http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/Week-of-Mon-20180611/006794.html
and agreed to address them in the next revision. That will happen after the
current vote to grant IPR protections to implementers of the specification
concludes. The purpose of this vote is described in the reply
http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/Week-of-Mon-20180611/006795.html,
and indeed, in the public blog post about the IPR review
http://openid.net/2018/06/08/public-review-period-for-openid-connect-federation-specification-started/.
Thank you again for taking the time to review the specification.
-- Mike
P.S. A vote against Implementer's Draft status essentially boils down to "I do
not want developers to have IPR protections when implementing this draft".
-----Original Message-----
From: board <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Schwartz
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OpenID board] Gluu OBJECTS to the approval of the OpenID Connect
Federation Spec
Gluu OBJECTS to the approval of the OpenID Federation spec. While we like the
direction of the work, NONE of our comments have been either addressed or
mitigated. The effort to reach consensus was NEGLIGIBLE to zero.
- Mike
--
------------------------
Michael Schwartz
Gluu
Founder / CEO
[email protected]
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nynymike/
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
