It's quite interesting and hard to say so I won't speculate other than
to say that for some of the low level FPS test, RoboVM was slower.
However, the numbers were suspicious in that they seemed to be capped at
a maximum frame rate. Needs more investigation to make sure that the
measurements were correct.
Steve
On 12/07/2013 11:03 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
BTW, we've run a VM performance benchmark against HotSpot on PI vs. RoboVM on
iOS and for raw power RoboVM seems faster (lower time to invoke a method, read
a field, etc etc). However in the real world RoboVM is slow and I don't know
why (GC overhead maybe)?
Richard
On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com> wrote:
That should be encouraging, since the CPU on the PI is *way* worse than the CPU
on an iPhone or iPad. Is the difference HotSpot vs. RoboVM? The graphics code
being executed should be pretty much exactly the same, and I would expect the
PowerVR to be able to handle this without any trouble.
Richard
On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote:
The performance is much better than JavaFX8 on iOS :(
Am 12.07.2013 um 15:37 schrieb August Lammersdorf, InteractiveMesh
<s...@interactivemesh.com>:
Found this on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-scxqJjTJKI
August
