Oh, right. Blob signing can't be verified with jarsigner...

-DrD-

> Thank you David. 
> 
> Interesting. 
> 
> Output from my gradle build (which uses the shemnon javafx-plugin) looks like 
> this: 
> ... 
> :classes 
> :jar 
> :jfxJar 
> :jfxSignJar 
> Signing (BLOB) C:\Users\ngalarneau\.gradle\caches\3rdpartylibrary.jar 
> Signed as C:\directory\to\3rdpartylibrary.jar 
> Signing (BLOB) C:\our\test\app.jar 
> Signed as C:\our\test\app.jar 
> :jfxCopyLibs 
> :compilePackageJava UP-TO-DATE 
> :compilePackageGroovy UP-TO-DATE 
> :processPackageResources UP-TO-DATE 
> :packageClasses UP-TO-DATE 
> :jfxDeploy 
> :assemble 
> :compileTestJava UP-TO-DATE 
> :compileTestGroovy UP-TO-DATE 
> :processTestResources UP-TO-DATE 
> :testClasses UP-TO-DATE 
> :test UP-TO-DATE 
> :check UP-TO-DATE 
> :build 
> 
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL 
> 
> And, when I run the Applet, it runs just fine. 
> 
> But yet, when I run the command line David sent, jarsigner reports: "jar is 
> unsigned" 
> 
> 
> I'm confused. 
> 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Neil 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        David DeHaven <david.deha...@oracle.com> 
> To:        ngalarn...@abinitio.com, 
> Cc:        Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>, 
> "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> 
> Date:        06/16/2014 06:18 PM 
> Subject:        Re: All-Permissions not working properly with 
> sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Run:
> jarsigner -verify -verbose -certs /path/to/some.jar
> 
> This will show (excessive) signing information as well as the certs used to 
> sign.
> 
> -DrD-
> 
> 
> > I will see if I can get permission to send you the program.
> > 
> > I believe all of my jars are signed with the same certificate. What is the 
> > best way to verify that?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks Kevin,
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:   Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>
> > To:     ngalarn...@abinitio.com, 
> > Cc:     Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com>, dmitry cherepanov 
> > <dmitry.cherepa...@oracle.com>, "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" 
> > <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net>
> > Date:   06/16/2014 06:12 PM
> > Subject:        Re: All-Permissions not working properly with 
> > sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > If you have a test program that you can send me, I can attach it for you.
> > 
> > Question for you: are all of your jar files (including the third-party 
> > libs) signed with the same certificate?
> > 
> > -- Kevin
> > 
> > 
> > ngalarn...@abinitio.com wrote: 
> > Also, because I can't login, I can't add a comment to the bug report. 
> > 
> > I am also getting a security exception even though my applet is signed & 
> > has all permissions. 
> > 
> > In this case it is happening on a call to getClassLoader() on the JavaFX 
> > thread (not a daemon thread): 
> > 
> > Exception in thread "JavaFX Application Thread" 
> > java.security.AccessControlException: access denied 
> > ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "getClassLoader") 
> >        at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(Unknown 
> > Source) 
> >        at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Unknown Source) 
> >        at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown Source) 
> >        at 
> > sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown Source) 
> > 
> >        at java.lang.ClassLoader.checkClassLoaderPermission(Unknown 
> > Source) 
> >        at java.lang.Class.getClassLoader(Unknown Source) 
> >        ... 
> > 
> > The call to getClassLoader() happens from inside a 3rd party library if 
> > that matters. 
> > 
> > When I run the identical code as a desktop application it works fine EVEN 
> > WHEN I ADD MY OWN SECURITY MANAGER. 
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you for any help, 
> > 
> > Neil 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:        Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com> 
> > To:        Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>, 
> > Cc:        "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> 
> > Date:        06/13/2014 08:19 PM 
> > Subject:        Re: All-Permissions not working properly with       
> > sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager 
> > Sent by:        "openjfx-dev" <openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Is there a way that people that are not project authors can get 
> > notifications of updates?  I can’t click to add myself to the watch list 
> > or vote without a login, and it seems to be near impossible to get a 
> > login.
> > The "Account Help” link on the login page is broken and everything I’ve 
> > found in the wiki indicates I need to be a project author to get an 
> > account.
> > 
> > Scott
> > 
> > 
> > On Jun 13, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Scott,
> >> 
> >> I created two new non-confidential bugs and closed the original ones as 
> > duplicates. Here are the new bugs:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> reflection in daemon thread: 
> >> JDK-8046825 (was JDK-8040699) : All-Permissions not working properly 
> > with sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager
> >> 
> >> security manager and applet-desc webstart mode: 
> >> JDK-8046826 (was JDK-8040231) : All permission fx javaws app could not 
> > set Security Manager to null.
> >> 
> >> I have copied Dmitry in case he has any information about these bugs.
> >> 
> >> -- Kevin
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Dmitry can comment further, but it is possible that this issue could be 
> > backported to 8u40 if done soon enough. 
> >>> 
> >>> I will double-check whether the bugs can be made non-confidential (so 
> > you can at least track progress), but I suspect they cannot in their 
> > current form, in which case new bugs should be filed with the confidential 
> > information moved to confidential comments in the bug. I will help with 
> > this. 
> >>> 
> >>> -- Kevin 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Scott Palmer wrote: 
> >>>> Drat... I was hoping to see something much sooner, like 8u20 
> > (obviously too late now) or 8u40.  I'm unable to use Web Start deployment 
> > because of this. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Is it necessary for these issues to be blocked from anonymous viewing? 
> > 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks for the update. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Scott 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Kevin Rushforth <
> > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>>    These are now assigned to Dmitry Cherapanov who I have copied here 
> > 
> >>>>    in case he isn't on the openjfx alias. They are both targeted to 
> >>>>    JDK 9. 
> >>>> 
> >>>>    -- Kevin 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>    Scott Palmer wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>>        I tried to send an email to Thomas asking about the status of 
> >>>>        these issues 
> >>>>        (they are not visible to me), but the email bounced (user 
> >>>>        unknown).  Could 
> >>>>        someone let me know the status? 
> >>>> 
> >>>>        Thanks, 
> >>>> 
> >>>>        Scott 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>        On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Thomas Ng 
> >>>>        <thomas.v...@oracle.com <mailto:thomas.v...@oracle.com>> 
> > wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>             Thanks for the report! 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Two bugs created for this: 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            security manager and applet-desc webstart mode: 
> >>>>            https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040231 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            reflection in daemon thread: 
> >>>>            https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040699 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            -thomas 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>              *From: *Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com 
> >>>>            <mailto:swpal...@gmail.com>> 
> >>>>             *Subject: **All-Permissions not working properly with 
> >>>>            sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager* 
> >>>>             *Date: *April 14, 2014 at 1:07:36 PM PDT 
> >>>>             *To: *"openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net 
> >>>>            <mailto:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net>" 
> >>>>            <openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net 
> >>>>            <mailto:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Can someone confirm that all-permissions is working for 
> >>>>            JavaFX apps 
> >>>>            that are launched via Web Start with Java 8.0 and use 
> >>>>            daemon threads 
> >>>>            in a Service? 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            I have a JNLP file that has: 
> >>>>            <security> 
> >>>>             <all-permissions/> 
> >>>>            </security> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            and the manifest of my app's jar has the following 
> >>>>            instruction in my 
> >>>>            Gradle script: 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            jar { 
> >>>>               manifest { 
> >>>>                   attributes('Permissions': 'all-permissions', 
> >>>>                              'Codebase': '*') 
> >>>>               } 
> >>>>            } 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            I'm using the javafx gradle plugin and signing the jars... 
> > 
> >>>>            e.g. I see this for every dependency and the main jar: 
> >>>>            ... 
> >>>>            Signing (BLOB) C:\Users\scott\.m2\caches\path\to\some.jar 
> >>>>            Signed as C:\Users\scott\dev\MyProject\build\libs\some.jar 
> > 
> >>>>            ... 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            I even tried System.setSecurityManager(null); in my 
> >>>>            start() method 
> >>>>            (and it lets me do it). 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            However, daemon threads started by my Service are unable 
> >>>>            to use 
> >>>>            reflection. (It is working in the main FX application 
> >>>>            thread.)  I see 
> >>>>            the following stack trace in the Java console: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access 
> > denied 
> >>>>            ("java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission" 
> > "suppressAccessChecks") 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>>            java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(Unknown 
> > 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Unknown 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown 
> > Source) 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>> 
> > sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>>            java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.setAccessible(Unknown 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access 
> > denied 
> >>>>            ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "accessDeclaredMembers") 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>>            java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(Unknown 
> > 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Unknown 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown 
> > Source) 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>> 
> > sun.plugin2.applet.FXAppletSecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown 
> >>>>            Source) 
> >>>>            at java.lang.Class.checkMemberAccess(Unknown Source) 
> >>>>            at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Unknown Source) 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>> 
> > ma.glasnost.orika.property.PropertyResolver.resolvePropertyType(PropertyResolver.java:304)
> >  
> > 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>> 
> > ma.glasnost.orika.property.PropertyResolver.processProperty(PropertyResolver.java:240)
> >  
> > 
> >>>>            at 
> >>>> 
> > ma.glasnost.orika.property.IntrospectorPropertyResolver.collectProperties(IntrospectorPropertyResolver.java:83)
> >  
> > 
> >>>>            ... 33 more 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            I bring it up here because FXAppletSecurityManager is 
> >>>>            involved and 
> >>>>            this smells like a possible bug in plugin2 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Regards, 
> >>>> 
> >>>>            Scott 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain 
> > information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally 
> > privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If 
> > received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make 
> > no further use, disclosure, or distribution. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain 
> > information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally 
> > privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If 
> > received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make 
> > no further use, disclosure, or distribution. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain 
> information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally 
> privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If 
> received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make no 
> further use, disclosure, or distribution.

Reply via email to