And to top it all off, supporting shared JVMs is extremely security challenging.

On Jul 8, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Stephen F Northover <steve.x.northo...@oracle.com> 
wrote:

> This would imply that there was more than on distinguished GUI thread per 
> process.  JavaFX runs in the native GUI thread by design and more than one 
> GUI thread is not supported in JavaFX and on some platforms (ie. Mac).
> 
> Steve
> 
> On 2014-07-08, 3:31 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> 
>> > Is running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM supported?
>> 
>> No, this is not supported. RT-29969 (and the non-public RT-32321) is about 
>> running multiple applets from the same web page, each in their own JVM. By 
>> design, JavaFX runs each applet in its own VM. It is very unlikely that we 
>> would ever add the ability to run more than JavaFX applet in the same VM.
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> ngalarn...@abinitio.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> What is the status of running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM 
>>> (separate_jvm = false)?
>>> When we try to load 2 applets into the same JVM we get a runtime error (I 
>>> think it was class loader related).
>>> 
>>> When I searched in jira I found RT-29969 (the 2 applet test it refers to 
>>> may or may not be in the same JVM) which points to RT-32321 which seems to 
>>> be private (it gives me an error when I try to access it).
>>> 
>>> Is running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM supported?
>>> 
>>> If not, is that a bug or a feature?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Neil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain 
>>> information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally 
>>> privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If 
>>> received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make no 
>>> further use, disclosure, or distribution. 
> 

Reply via email to