And to top it all off, supporting shared JVMs is extremely security challenging.
On Jul 8, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Stephen F Northover <steve.x.northo...@oracle.com> wrote: > This would imply that there was more than on distinguished GUI thread per > process. JavaFX runs in the native GUI thread by design and more than one > GUI thread is not supported in JavaFX and on some platforms (ie. Mac). > > Steve > > On 2014-07-08, 3:31 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> >> > Is running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM supported? >> >> No, this is not supported. RT-29969 (and the non-public RT-32321) is about >> running multiple applets from the same web page, each in their own JVM. By >> design, JavaFX runs each applet in its own VM. It is very unlikely that we >> would ever add the ability to run more than JavaFX applet in the same VM. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> ngalarn...@abinitio.com wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> What is the status of running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM >>> (separate_jvm = false)? >>> When we try to load 2 applets into the same JVM we get a runtime error (I >>> think it was class loader related). >>> >>> When I searched in jira I found RT-29969 (the 2 applet test it refers to >>> may or may not be in the same JVM) which points to RT-32321 which seems to >>> be private (it gives me an error when I try to access it). >>> >>> Is running 2 JavaFX applets in the same JVM supported? >>> >>> If not, is that a bug or a feature? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Neil >>> >>> >>> >>> NOTICE from Ab Initio: This email (including any attachments) may contain >>> information that is subject to confidentiality obligations or is legally >>> privileged, and sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. If >>> received in error, please notify the sender, delete this email, and make no >>> further use, disclosure, or distribution. >
