+1 for CSS performance

Also I would sing and dance if some fine day the following *smaller* features 
would finally make using FXML really fun:
* Complete FXML binding syntax (JDK-8088368 [Support for Hash-Operator], 
JDK-8132450 [Custom Conversions in FXML],  JDK-8137089) 
* More bindings (JDK-8134676, JDK-8134679, JDK-8132254) 


-----Original Message-----
From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of 
Jonathan Giles
Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016 00:45
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Planning for JavaFX.next

Hi folks,

Development on JDK 9 is slowly starting to ramp down, and we are starting to 
turn our attention to the goals for JavaFX in JDK 10 and beyond. We are 
starting to compile our list of what we think is important, but we really want 
to hear from the community about what their highest priorities are to them. As 
always, it's important to keep in mind what JavaFX is (e.g. it isn't aiming to 
be a high-performance game engine), but even still there are bound to be a 
number of places where people might want to weigh in, for example:

  * New layout containers (e.g. Flexbox)
  * Public APIs for UI control behaviors
  * Marlin renderer enabled by default
  * Support for CSS animations
  * CSS performance improvements
  * TableView improvements (cell spanning, row / column freezing, etc)
  * TableView performance
  * Focus traversal API
  * WebGL support in WebView
  * Improved image I/O support
  * A JavaFX equivalent of the AWT Desktop APIs
  * Multi-res image API
  * NIO-backed writable images

If there are other areas of interest that aren't listed here, please start 
discussing them and we can work together to determine priorities. 
If all you want to do is add a +1 for one of more of the items above, even that 
will be very useful.

-- Jonathan

Reply via email to