Added. This is a questionable use of @see anyway.
Thanks.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
Add this to the list as well please:
javafx.scene.image.Image's constructors:
- Image(String url)
- Image(String url, boolean backgroundLoading)
- Image(String url, double requestedWidth, double requestedHeight,
boolean preserveRatio, boolean smooth)
all have a @see annotation pointing to a private constructor. This
makes the link in the generated docs do nothing.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
I just filed a new issue to catch any last minute typos:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070>
I'll add your note to this new JBS bug.
Thank you.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes
in the docs.
I can't submit issues to the JIRA so I'll list them here. A
similar issue
was https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177341
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177341>.
- The following use "a Observable..." instead of "an
Observable...".
- javafx.beans.property
- ListProperty<E>
- MapProperty<K,V>
- ReadOnlyListPropertyBase<E>
- SetProperty<E>
- javafx.beans.binding
- NumberExpression
- BooleanExpression
- DoubleExpression
- FloatExpression
- IntegerExpression
- ListExpression
- LongExpression
- MapExpression
- ObjectExpression
- SetExpression
- StringExpression
- javafx.scene.shape.ObservableFaceArray copies its
description
from its superinteface ObservableIntegerArray, does not
declare any API
methods and is listed under package javafx.scene.shape.
It's not clear at
all what this interface is. As it is, it looks like it's
not meant to be
exposed.
- javafx.collections.ObservableIntegerArray uses "a int[]"
instead of
"an int[]". This writing ("a int") is found in
java.lang.Integer as well in
a few places.
Nir
