Looks like the above didn't make it in time. Can it be fixed in the next batch?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hopefully this makes it in time: > > javafx.scene.control.TreeView<T> has wrong javadoc for the > queryAccessibleAttribute method. The source code uses javadoc blocks as > titles, but they should probably be regular comment blocks. > One of those blocks has been read as the doc for the method because that > method has no doc. > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> I just filed a new issue to catch any last minute typos: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070 >> >> I'll add your note to this new JBS bug. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> >> >> Nir Lisker wrote: >> >>> I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes in the >>> docs. >>> I can't submit issues to the JIRA so I'll list them here. A similar issue >>> was https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177341. >>> >>> >>> - The following use "a Observable..." instead of "an Observable...". >>> - javafx.beans.property >>> - ListProperty<E> >>> - MapProperty<K,V> >>> - ReadOnlyListPropertyBase<E> >>> - SetProperty<E> >>> - javafx.beans.binding >>> - NumberExpression >>> - BooleanExpression >>> - DoubleExpression >>> - FloatExpression >>> - IntegerExpression >>> - ListExpression >>> - LongExpression >>> - MapExpression >>> - ObjectExpression >>> - SetExpression >>> - StringExpression >>> - javafx.scene.shape.ObservableFaceArray copies its description >>> from its superinteface ObservableIntegerArray, does not declare any >>> API >>> methods and is listed under package javafx.scene.shape. It's not >>> clear at >>> all what this interface is. As it is, it looks like it's not meant to >>> be >>> exposed. >>> - javafx.collections.ObservableIntegerArray uses "a int[]" instead of >>> "an int[]". This writing ("a int") is found in java.lang.Integer as >>> well in >>> a few places. >>> >>> Nir >>> >>> >> >
