Another typo:

In javafx.scene.Scene, all onDragDone methods and the property use "@{code
Scene}" instead of "{@code Scene}".

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
> wrote:

> I just filed a new issue to catch any last minute typos:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070
>
> I'll add your note to this new JBS bug.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes in the docs.
>> I can't submit issues to the JIRA so I'll list them here. A similar issue
>> was https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177341.
>>
>>
>>    - The following use "a Observable..." instead of "an Observable...".
>>    - javafx.beans.property
>>          - ListProperty<E>
>>          - MapProperty<K,V>
>>          - ReadOnlyListPropertyBase<E>
>>          - SetProperty<E>
>>       - javafx.beans.binding
>>          - NumberExpression
>>          - BooleanExpression
>>          - DoubleExpression
>>          - FloatExpression
>>          - IntegerExpression
>>          - ListExpression
>>          - LongExpression
>>          - MapExpression
>>          - ObjectExpression
>>          - SetExpression
>>          - StringExpression
>>          - javafx.scene.shape.ObservableFaceArray copies its description
>>    from its superinteface ObservableIntegerArray, does not declare any API
>>    methods and is listed under package javafx.scene.shape. It's not clear
>> at
>>    all what this interface is. As it is, it looks like it's not meant to
>> be
>>    exposed.
>>    - javafx.collections.ObservableIntegerArray uses "a int[]" instead of
>>    "an int[]". This writing ("a int") is found in java.lang.Integer as
>> well in
>>    a few places.
>>
>> Nir
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to