Kevin, can we get a label for this? - Nir
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> wrote: > Hi Nir, > > About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository. That was > just some testing before we did the real thing. > > As for the other points: I agree > > - Johan > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> A few comments about the mirror and JBS: >> >> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to JBS be >> included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a >> discussion, edit it in. >> >> 2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > Link > Web >> Link and in the Link Text use something like "GitHub mirror" (open for >> suggestions). JIRA renders the link in an easy to see way (easier than >> looking at URLs). Iv'e tried it in a couple of issues, e.g., >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795 and it seems preferable >> to >> me. >> >> 3. In JBS, I suggest a new label will be used for issues which are linked >> to GitHub for search purposes. This is similar to the webbug label. >> >> If these are agreeable, please add them to the contribution instructions. >> >> 4. What is https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev? Newcomers can confuse >> it >> with javafxports/openjdk-jfx. >> >> 5. When the mirror is fully ready and operational, we should advertise on >> community pages (like Reddit) to gather up contributors. Please keep a >> mental reminder when the time comes. >> >> Thanks to all who are working on this. >> >> - Nir >> >
