github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or
leave them as URLs?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com
<mailto:johan....@gluonhq.com>> wrote:
+1
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we
start using the
JBS label:
github-bug
To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues
and/or PRs
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
> I think that the labels should be succinct, so one
label should suffice.
> Either github-link or github-bug are fine for me, the
latter because there
> is webbug label already. If a PR needs review just use
the review-request
> existing label.
>
> As for issues and PRs, the issue links section in the
JIRA ticket could
> reflect what exists in GitHub, so there can be 2 web
links named "GitHub
> issue" and "GitHub PR" if need be.
>
> - Nir
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Schindl
<tom.schi...@bestsolution.at
<mailto:tom.schi...@bestsolution.at>>
> wrote:
>
>
>> well could we have 2:
>> * github-issue
>> * github-pr
>>
>> The first one indicates someone is working on it over
at github, whereas
>> the second means there's a PR that needs to be review.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 29.03.18 08:42, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As such github references point to either issue or
PR, I recommend using
>>> the term 'github-link'.
>>>
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 29 mars 2018 à 03:40, Kevin Rushforth <
>>>
>> kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>
>>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think this would be fine. We would want something
that didn't conflict
>>>> with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible
choices:
>>>>
>>>> github-link
>>>> github-bug
>>>> gitbug-issue
>>>>
>>>> Any preferences?
>>>>
>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nir Lisker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kevin, can we get a label for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Nir
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos
<johan....@gluonhq.com <mailto:johan....@gluonhq.com>>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Nir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed
that repository. That
>>>>>>
>>>> was
>>>>
>>>>>> just some testing before we did the real thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for the other points: I agree
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Johan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker
<nlis...@gmail.com <mailto:nlis...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly
suggest that the link to
>>>>>>>
>>>> JBS be
>>>>
>>>>>>> included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was
created after a
>>>>>>> discussion, edit it in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror
via More > Link >
>>>>>>>
>> Web
>>
>>>>>>> Link and in the Link Text use something like
"GitHub mirror" (open
>>>>>>>
>> for
>>
>>>>>>> suggestions). JIRA renders the link in an easy to
see way (easier
>>>>>>>
>> than
>>
>>>>>>> looking at URLs). Iv'e tried it in a couple of
issues, e.g.,
>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795> and it
seems
>>>>>>>
>>>> preferable
>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. In JBS, I suggest a new label will be used for
issues which are
>>>>>>>
>>>> linked
>>>>
>>>>>>> to GitHub for search purposes. This is similar to
the webbug label.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If these are agreeable, please add them to the
contribution
>>>>>>>
>>>> instructions.
>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. What is https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev
<https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev>? Newcomers can
>>>>>>>
>>>> confuse
>>>>
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> with javafxports/openjdk-jfx.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5. When the mirror is fully ready and
operational, we should
>>>>>>>
>> advertise
>>
>>>> on
>>>>
>>>>>>> community pages (like Reddit) to gather up
contributors. Please keep
>>>>>>>
>> a
>>
>>>>>>> mental reminder when the time comes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to all who are working on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Nir
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
