Iv'e done some house cleaning and linked whatever I found. Should have caused a decent amount of notification spam...
- Nir On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > I don't have a strong preference. The URL contains either "issue" or > "pull" already, so there should be no confusion if we just use the URL. > > > -- Kevin > > > Nir Lisker wrote: > > github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or leave > them as URLs? > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth < >> kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the >>> JBS label: >>> >>> github-bug >>> >>> To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs >>> >>> -- Kevin >>> >>> >>> Nir Lisker wrote: >>> > I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should >>> suffice. >>> > Either github-link or github-bug are fine for me, the latter because >>> there >>> > is webbug label already. If a PR needs review just use the >>> review-request >>> > existing label. >>> > >>> > As for issues and PRs, the issue links section in the JIRA ticket could >>> > reflect what exists in GitHub, so there can be 2 web links named >>> "GitHub >>> > issue" and "GitHub PR" if need be. >>> > >>> > - Nir >>> > >>> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Schindl < >>> tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> >> well could we have 2: >>> >> * github-issue >>> >> * github-pr >>> >> >>> >> The first one indicates someone is working on it over at github, >>> whereas >>> >> the second means there's a PR that needs to be review. >>> >> >>> >> Tom >>> >> >>> >> On 29.03.18 08:42, Laurent Bourgès wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> As such github references point to either issue or PR, I recommend >>> using >>> >>> the term 'github-link'. >>> >>> >>> >>> Laurent >>> >>> >>> >>> Le jeu. 29 mars 2018 à 03:40, Kevin Rushforth < >>> >>> >>> >> kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >>> >> >>> >>> a écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I think this would be fine. We would want something that didn't >>> conflict >>> >>>> with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible choices: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> github-link >>> >>>> github-bug >>> >>>> gitbug-issue >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Any preferences? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- Kevin >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Nir Lisker wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Kevin, can we get a label for this? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> - Nir >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi Nir, >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository. >>> That >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>> was >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> just some testing before we did the real thing. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> As for the other points: I agree >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> - Johan >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker <nlis...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> A few comments about the mirror and JBS: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link >>> to >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>> JBS be >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a >>> >>>>>>> discussion, edit it in. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> 2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > >>> Link > >>> >>>>>>> >>> >> Web >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Link and in the Link Text use something like "GitHub mirror" >>> (open >>> >>>>>>> >>> >> for >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> suggestions). JIRA renders the link in an easy to see way (easier >>> >>>>>>> >>> >> than >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> looking at URLs). Iv'e tried it in a couple of issues, e.g., >>> >>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795 and it seems >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>> preferable >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> to >>> >>>>>>> me. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> 3. In JBS, I suggest a new label will be used for issues which >>> are >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>> linked >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> to GitHub for search purposes. This is similar to the webbug >>> label. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> If these are agreeable, please add them to the contribution >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>> instructions. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> 4. What is https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev? Newcomers can >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>> confuse >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> it >>> >>>>>>> with javafxports/openjdk-jfx. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> 5. When the mirror is fully ready and operational, we should >>> >>>>>>> >>> >> advertise >>> >> >>> >>>> on >>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> community pages (like Reddit) to gather up contributors. Please >>> keep >>> >>>>>>> >>> >> a >>> >> >>> >>>>>>> mental reminder when the time comes. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks to all who are working on this. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> - Nir >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>
