On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:40:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> We discovered three minor differences between the `libxslt.md` file and the > libxslt-1.1.34 source bundle: > > 1. The copyright years didn't match the source > > 2. The following line was missing: > Licence for libxslt except libexslt > > 3. The terms currently lists `BLFS` rather than `DANIEL VEILLARD` in one > place. > > Note to reviewers: > > I pushed this in two commits as an aid to reviewing it (as with any other PR, > it will be squashed during integration). The first commit just fixes the > above three issues without any reformatting of the lines. The second commit > has no changes in the content itself, but re-wraps the lines to match the > source. > > ---------------- > > Commits: > - 07be5f50: Reformat to match format of original source -- no changes in > content > - 68adb259: 8234704: Fix attribution in libxslt.md > > Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52/files > Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/52/webrev.00 > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234704 > Stats: 20 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 18 mod > Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52.diff > Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/52/head:pull/52 Reviewers: @prrace or @guruhb (only one reviewer should be needed) PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52
