On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:51:28 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:40:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote: > >> We discovered three minor differences between the `libxslt.md` file and the >> libxslt-1.1.34 source bundle: >> >> 1. The copyright years didn't match the source >> >> 2. The following line was missing: >> Licence for libxslt except libexslt >> >> 3. The terms currently lists `BLFS` rather than `DANIEL VEILLARD` in one >> place. >> >> Note to reviewers: >> >> I pushed this in two commits as an aid to reviewing it (as with any other >> PR, it will be squashed during integration). The first commit just fixes the >> above three issues without any reformatting of the lines. The second commit >> has no changes in the content itself, but re-wraps the lines to match the >> source. >> >> ---------------- >> >> Commits: >> - 07be5f50: Reformat to match format of original source -- no changes in >> content >> - 68adb259: 8234704: Fix attribution in libxslt.md >> >> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52/files >> Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/52/webrev.00 >> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234704 >> Stats: 20 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 18 mod >> Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52.diff >> Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/52/head:pull/52 > > "THE DANIEL VEILLARD" > > The one and only ? Was THE supposed to be here ? > > ---------------- > > Changes requested by prr (Reviewer). > "THE DANIEL VEILLARD" Strange as it may seem, yes. This is taken exactly from the `COPYING` file in the `libxslt-1.1.34.tar.gz` bundle. PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/52
