On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:52:20 GMT, Nir Lisker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you list the other affected methods?
>>
>> at line 211 (in the changed skinBase)
>>
>> /**
>> * Subclasses can invoke this method to register that they want to
>> listen to
>> * property change events for the given property. Registered {@link
>> Consumer} instances
>> * will be executed in the order in which they are registered.
>> * @param property the property
>> * @param consumer the consumer
>> */
>> protected final void registerChangeListener(ObservableValue<?> property,
>> Consumer<ObservableValue<?>> consumer) {
>>
>>
>>
>> and at line 255
>>
>> /**
>> * Unregisters all change listeners that have been registered using
>> {@link #registerChangeListener(ObservableValue, Consumer)}
>> * for the given property. The end result is that the given property is
>> no longer observed by any of the change
>> * listeners, but it may still have additional listeners registered on
>> it through means outside of
>> * {@link #registerChangeListener(ObservableValue, Consumer)}.
>> *
>> * @param property The property for which all listeners should be
>> removed.
>> * @return A single chained {@link Consumer} consisting of all {@link
>> Consumer consumers} registered through
>> * {@link #registerChangeListener(ObservableValue, Consumer)}. If
>> no consumers have been registered on this
>> * property, null will be returned.
>> * @since 9
>> */
>> protected final Consumer<ObservableValue<?>>
>> unregisterChangeListeners(ObservableValue<?> property) {
>
> I see. I recommend that they be improved in this PR. I don't know if this
> will need to be part of the CSR, though.
Making this change seems fine to me, and better than using different language
in the new methods without fixing the existing.
> I don't know if this will need to be part of the CSR, though.
It would be best to include them.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/409
