Hi Johan, Would you prefer a pure Wayland backend or support it with gdk/GTK on top of the current glass backend?
Cheers Em ter, 10 de ago de 2021 07:52, Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> escreveu: > I think we (everyone committing/reviewing in openjdk/jfx) did a great job > with the 17-work: an impressive amount of old and annoying bugs are fixed. > For 18 and beyond, I believe we have to keep working on those old issues -- > at least if they are still relevant. > Also, I am 100% ok with the list of issues Kevin mentioned that need to be > moved forward now. > > Apart from that, I want to have support for Metal and Wayland in JavaFX 18. > > - Johan > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:58 PM Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > Now that JavaFX 17 is in RDP2, we can turn more attention to bug fixes > > and enhancement requests for JavaFX 18. It's the summer, so there may be > > delays as some people are out at various times (including me), but I > > would like to get some of the outstanding enhancement requests moving > > over the next few weeks. > > > > Specifically, I'd like to see the following proceed: > > > > * Transparent backgrounds in WebView > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090547 > > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/563 > > > > * Add DirectionalLight > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234921 > > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/548 > > > > * CSS pseudoclasses :focus-visible and :focus-within > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268225 > > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/475 > > > > * Improve property system to facilitate correct usage (minus the binary > > incompatible API change) > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268642 > > PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/590 (Draft) > > > > And maybe the following: > > > > * Add CSS themes as a first-class concept (need a consensus on how to > > proceed) > > > > * Undecorated interactive stage style (still in early discussion, but > > the concept looks interesting and useful) > > > > There are probably others I'm forgetting. > > > > Each of the above should be discussed in their own thread on openjfx-dev > > rather than a reply to this thread. > > > > -- Kevin > > > > > > >
