On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 00:20:43 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> It's not really a memory leak, the amount of memory that it can take can just > be quite large in the right circumstances. In that case, I edited the title of the JBS bug to remove the `Memory leak and` part (I also remove the `(hbox)` since any nested container could do the same). Can you edit the PR title to match? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1076#issuecomment-1585686953
