On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 21:31:32 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/util/Utils.java line
>> 1008:
>>
>>> 1006: * @param runnable a {@code Runnable} encapsulating the code
>>> 1007: */
>>> 1008: public static void runOnFxThread(Runnable runnable) {
>>
>> I understand that this is a private package, and not public API, but do we
>> need a null check of `runnable`? (Not needed for the current uses added from
>> this PR, but possibly for future uses?)
>
> I thought about it when I wrote this method, but I don't see much value in it
> for an internal utility method as it doesn't serve as a boundary. In
> addition, there was a discussion about future work that will eliminate the
> need for this method by dealing with the threading issue at a deeper level,
> so it is somewhat temporary.
I wouldn't worry about it. We have many methods that take a Runnable and don't
do a null check.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1469538109
