On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:16:00 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I was also going to suggest `xxImpl` with a short javadoc comment. That is a 
>> pattern we use elsewhere. I don't dislike the current name, but I can see 
>> Jose's point.
>
> Changed to `xxImpl` with a doc comment.

Thanks. You missed the one in Timeline (which is why there is a compilation 
error).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1469806371

Reply via email to