On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:37:22 GMT, Johan Vos <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I might be confused, but wasn't the idea to use a new property (e.g. > jfx.feature.variant) instead of overloading the existing jfx.release.suffix? This PR does add a new property in `build.properties`,`jfx.experimental.release.suffix`, and does not require modifying `jfx.release.suffix`. For example, in the "metal" branch of the jfx-sandbox, we would define this as: jfx.experimental.release.suffix=-metal ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#issuecomment-2480636641
