On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:39:44 GMT, Michael Strauß <[email protected]> wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/layout/HeaderBar.java >> line 888: >> >>> 886: this.leftSystemInset = new ReadOnlyObjectWrapper<>(stage, >>> "HeaderBar.leftSystemInset", EMPTY); >>> 887: this.rightSystemInset = new ReadOnlyObjectWrapper<>(stage, >>> "HeaderBar.rightSystemInset", EMPTY); >>> 888: this.minSystemHeight = new ReadOnlyDoubleWrapper(stage, >>> "HeaderBar.minSystemHeight"); >> >> Should the classname prefix in the property `name` be fully qualified? If it >> were, then a utility could find the corresponding method(s) from the bean >> using the convention that if a name contains a `.`, it is an attached >> property with the bean being an argument to the named (static) method. > > This is pending a discussion on the [mailing > list](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2025-November/057431.html). Thanks. I saw that, but hadn't had time to respond. I'll do that in the next day or two. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1936#discussion_r2535872208
