Howard Chu wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> If it works, then we still have an issue: operations for "o=1,o=2" will >> probably be intercepted by the back-bdb. However, I understand that >> since the first database is glued, it wants to know whom it's glued to. > > A fix is in HEAD. It will allow this scenario to succeed, but it will > also allow completely broken subordinate configs to be dynamically > created in cn=config. (configs read from slapd.conf/slapd.d will still > be error checked appropriately.) As such, it needs a bit more thought.
Need ldap-txn, don't we? p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: [email protected] -----------------------------------
