Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > Howard Chu wrote: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> If it works, then we still have an issue: operations for "o=1,o=2" will >>> probably be intercepted by the back-bdb. However, I understand that >>> since the first database is glued, it wants to know whom it's glued to. >> A fix is in HEAD. It will allow this scenario to succeed, but it will >> also allow completely broken subordinate configs to be dynamically >> created in cn=config. (configs read from slapd.conf/slapd.d will still >> be error checked appropriately.) As such, it needs a bit more thought. > > Need ldap-txn, don't we?
I guess that could help. We haven't figured out yet how to propagate TXNs in syncrepl though. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
