[email protected] wrote: > If it works, then we still have an issue: operations for "o=1,o=2" will > probably be intercepted by the back-bdb. However, I understand that > since the first database is glued, it wants to know whom it's glued to.
A fix is in HEAD. It will allow this scenario to succeed, but it will also allow completely broken subordinate configs to be dynamically created in cn=config. (configs read from slapd.conf/slapd.d will still be error checked appropriately.) As such, it needs a bit more thought. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
