On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 04:28:07PM +0100, Jan Lübbe wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:10 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > They're alises for the same underlying control for power purposes, > > although there's some gotchas there... > To me it seems that even with the same alsa state, the dapm state > depends on something else (such as the order in which this state was > reached). Yes, those are the gotchas. Doing the aliasing like this needs to be done very carefully if it's going to work, otherwise some updates won't be noticed.
