On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:36:36PM +0530, Carl Lobo wrote: > IMHO it would be really difficult to find out exactly when to apply > the workaround from the kernel point of view... we're not doing > anything special except restoring the state and the same controls are > changed for other states/combination of states as well.
It depends. If there is actually a valid path through the device then the workaround should not be required - the kernel should be able to figure out that it should power everything on by itself with no intervention. I need to confirm that this is what's going on, though.
