On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Freddie Chopin <freddie_cho...@op.pl> wrote: > W dniu 2012-01-25 19:29, Michael Schwingen pisze: >> Why maintain two separate loader versions if they are quite similar, and >> the M0-Loader will work on M3 systems? >> >> Having separate, nearly duplicate code is only warranted if there is >> some real performance gain from this. > > We'll see how the numbers will look like... >
What do you mean? What numbers? Performance-wise, there's no noticeable difference. Flash writing speed on the STM32F1x is not CPU bound. And the algorithm is exactly the same size (actually two bytes shorter thanks to the bug fix) so there's no difference in downloading speed. We're talking a few clock cycles penalty here, flash writing takes 50µs (=400 cycles running off internal RC) per 16 bit. /Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel