Ken Smith wrote: > Which Cortex-M3 works best with OpenOCD? I'm considering one of these > based on LPC1768. > > http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9931
SparkFun as always overpriced, but the board does work with OpenOCD. It hasn't been perfect for me, but it does work. LPC17 has the advantage that they have both JTAG and SWD, as opposed only SWD for many other Cortex-M3 parts. > Any experience with it using OpenOCD? Do you recommend another? Is > it difficult to deal with the two separate SRAM's? There's only one SRAM? > The recent conversation on the list makes me think that STM32 might > be a better choice than NXP. Please feel free to give an opinion or > an account of your experience. I've used it, it works, it's not perfect. You may have to power cycle to get working communication. It is an outstanding target if you have will to contribute to OpenOCD, because I believe the part exercises some of the code which can be improved. Make sure that you also get a well supported JTAG adapter. I've used FT2232-based adapters with the LPC1768, but I haven't yet used the Versaloon. I wouldn't mind trying that as well, for comparison. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
