On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:16 PM, freddie_chopin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Andreas Fritiofson >> I think Freddie's idea to use a different directory >> name than "ftdi" is a good compromise. > > It's done like that right now - the configs are in a separate directory. > > http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/534/
Yes but the "ftdi" directory is a bit confusing. But it is not a major problem though. Some of the config file apparently does not work (eg: luminary.cfg in the current form) but that can be fixed along the way. > If we're "voting" I say that it could be merged before releasing 0.6.0 > - it's a completely separate thing that does not affect other drivers > (much - it uses libusb1 and makes stlink use this library variant too). I agree with you that it could be merged before 0.6.0 release and be labeled as experimental. I think it does not interfere with stlink. Andreas' patch does not use the existing libusb-1.0 infrastructure which Peter Stuge strongly dislike. Have you done the test with the latest patch series? I will continue my testing now that Andreas' simple advice to pull the patches works very nicely. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
