On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Paul Fertser <fercer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think there is no real work on the libusb-compat side to make it >> as easy to build as the regular libusb. You may want to try again >> in the libusb mailing list to see the response. > > My point is that the work is already done and libusb-compat is already > buildable on windows natively with just a small patch, you can just > take the patch, discuss and merge upstream, I think. And libusb-compat > might be useful for plenty of projects as they do not depend on > non-standard additions to libusb-0.1 API. >
I think the job is not done, at least not up to the standard of libusb Windows backend. If you look at the libusb Windows backend, you will need to support Microsoft Studio along with MinGW/Cygwin. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
