Felipe Balbi wrote: > "generic" libraries with well defined API.
Yes. > I don't mind having turing-complete expressions. In fact I find it very > nice that we can pretty much program openocd to do whatever we want. It's not really possible to refactor the language operators if the expressions can be turing-complete. That means the language is guaranteed to be obsolete before first release. Simpler expressions can be translated back and forth, even after a decade. Fairly few of the Tcl files make significant use of Tcl, so C code could just as well implement that functionality, especially assuming a clean library stack underneath. > need to have some sort of C-like macros and simple expressions, as > that helps implementing board/SoC initialization. Completely agreed. //Peter
pgpOGnDvmKlls.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
