Hi Oleksij, On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Oleksij Rempel <li...@rempel-privat.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > i started this discussion on the irc #openocd. As PaulFertser suggested, > lets move it to the mailing list. > > To make at least some of the commands more consistent, i decided to > rework adapter related part. Initial patch is here: > http://openocd.zylin.com/4774 > > Here are the old variants of adapter related commands: > ftdi_location <location> > interface <name> > interface_list > interface_name > adapter_nsrst_delay > adapter_nsrst_assert_width > interface_transports > adapter_khz > > here is my new: > adapter usb location <location> (set usb location of usb adapter) > adapter driver set <name> (select adapter driver) > adapter driver get (get configured driver name) > adapter driver list (list build in drivers) > adapter srst delay_after (delay after srst deasserted) > adapter srst width (assertion pulse width) > adapter transports (set list of supported transports by adapter) > adapter khz (set clock rate of TCLK line) > > By "adapter khz" and "adapter transports", i'm not 100% sure. For the > firs one, I can imagine some thing like "adapter tclk rate <rate>". > > Comments, suggestions, ideas related to this topic are welcome! > Apart from the mechanical aspects of having a shared command context across multiple modules, this is a rather radical departure from how targets are configured today and could have wide-ranging consequences. Out of curiosity, what is driving you toward this conclusion? Is there a technical issue that you're trying to solve with this proposal? Cheers, Steve
_______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
