On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Spencer Oliver <s...@spen-soft.co.uk> wrote: > >> Does the LPC2148 (which I have) exhibit the same problem? >> >> I can not test the attached patch here, but it is intended to >> allow switching between the long(old) or new (short) >> tms_sequence tables. The patch uses the short table as default. >> >> Try: >> >> tms_sequence long >> tms_sequence short >> > > Just checked with a luminary target i had to hand. > Using tms_sequence long fixes the error's seen during the first > jtag_examine_chain call.
Could this be a missing jtag_add_pathmove()? We want to make OpenOCD robust against the particular path taken do we not? -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
