Michael Bruck wrote: > Dirk, did this happen when you used the drscan/irscan commands?
Not sure, but possible. Have a look to tap-enable event of http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/openocd/trunk/src/target/target/omap3530.cfg > Given that this is only an assert Well, at least OpenOCD stopped here, so it might be more that 'only' an assert ;) As mentioned, with r1865 it still worked. > I think we'll have to add more > checking to these commands to give meaningful errors if someone uses > them incorrectly. Best regards Dirk > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Rick Altherr <[email protected]> wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: >> >>> Just want to let you know that with recent svn head r1870 I get >>> >>> trying to validate configured JTAG chain anyway... >>> openocd: jtag.c:889: interface_jtag_add_dr_scan: Assertion `field == >>> out_fields + scan->num_fields' failed. >>> >>> while at least r1865 seems to work. Found while playing with OMAP3 >>> scripts. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Dirk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openocd-development mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development >> >> The assert fires when interface_jtag_add_dr_scan() is called with fields for >> taps that are in bypass. Technically not a hard error, but this does mean >> that unnecessary data is being passed around. Can you run in the debugger >> and get a backtrace when this happens? >> >> -- >> Rick Altherr >> [email protected] >> >> "He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it >> with him." >> -- Unsigned >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openocd-development mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development >> >> > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
