On Thursday 21 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > You didn't talk about when you cut the branch. I don't think we want > to slow down development in svn head for much more than a week or two?
Alternatively, isn't the "branch" where all non-essential stuff should be parked until head is stabilized and cuts the release? With everyone focussing energy on the release, instead of any non-essential stuff? (Or what lots of folk do: private "quilt" series, updated as needed, until head opens to non-bugfix patches.) Agreed that key "when" parts were missing. Pending a working testing/QA/bug tracking proposal ... should there at least be a working schedule the next release? Maybe like: 25 May (Monday) -- last "features" go in ... four weeks of stability/testing/fixing/polish ... with weekly milestone labels, "RC1", "RC2", etc 22 June (Monday) -- target for release That's just an idea. Maybe three weeks of focussed work is a better target; only take another if that doesn't suffice. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
