On Thursday 21 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> You didn't talk about when you cut the branch. I don't think we want
> to slow down development in svn head for much more than a week or two?

Alternatively, isn't the "branch" where all non-essential stuff
should be parked until head is stabilized and cuts the release?
With everyone focussing energy on the release, instead of any
non-essential stuff?

(Or what lots of folk do:  private "quilt" series, updated as
needed, until head opens to non-bugfix patches.)


Agreed that key "when" parts were missing.  Pending a working
testing/QA/bug tracking proposal ... should there at least be
a working schedule the next release?  Maybe like:

  25 May (Monday) -- last "features" go in
  ... four weeks of stability/testing/fixing/polish
  ... with weekly milestone labels, "RC1", "RC2", etc
  22 June (Monday) -- target for release

That's just an idea.  Maybe three weeks of focussed work is
a better target; only take another if that doesn't suffice.

- Dave
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to