On May 22, 2009, at 12:04 AM, David Brownell wrote:

On Thursday 21 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
You didn't talk about when you cut the branch. I don't think we want
to slow down development in svn head for much more than a week or two?

Alternatively, isn't the "branch" where all non-essential stuff
should be parked until head is stabilized and cuts the release?
With everyone focussing energy on the release, instead of any
non-essential stuff?


I'm not fond of making branches to serve as the "trunk after the release". That just makes a lot of work for the release maintainer to straighten out the tree later. Now, I'm all for having large features developed on branches.

(Or what lots of folk do:  private "quilt" series, updated as
needed, until head opens to non-bugfix patches.)


I encourage developers to use tools like git-svn or quilt to build and maintain patchsets until they can be integrated into the trunk.


Agreed that key "when" parts were missing.  Pending a working
testing/QA/bug tracking proposal ... should there at least be
a working schedule the next release?  Maybe like:

 25 May (Monday) -- last "features" go in
 ... four weeks of stability/testing/fixing/polish
 ... with weekly milestone labels, "RC1", "RC2", etc
 22 June (Monday) -- target for release

That's just an idea.  Maybe three weeks of focussed work is
a better target; only take another if that doesn't suffice.

- Dave


A while back, we had kicked around a tentative date of 7/1. I'm not tied to it by any means, but it does seem to provide sufficient time to stabilize. As for doing RCs, I like to start that in the last 2 week window when the accepted patches are few and the branch has been cut. That way the RCs are tagged from the branch and things are already pretty stable.

--
Rick Altherr
[email protected]

"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
 -- Unsigned



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to