On Monday 23 November 2009, Liam Redmond (Rock Software) wrote: > > Sadly, that also requires a lot of engineering expertise to write that > > Actually the hardware description is not as bad as you might first think, I > have a prototype Xilinx CoolRunnerII CPLD hooked up to a Cypress high speed > FX2, this effectively gives a direct pipe from the OpenOCD USB calls to the > CPLD (via the FX2 slave interface).
I was always intrigued by that FX2 GPIF stuff -- that's what you're talking about? I think they did that to speed up IDE-to-FIFO data transfers, so the CPU wouldn't be involved. On the other hand, any 8051 is a turn-off for me. :( That's why I mentioned Cortex-M3. There are a lot of those around; and GCC handles them quite nicely. So does OpenOCD, for that matter! - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
